DEFENDANTS REPLY TO STATES RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO CORRECT ERROR

 Comes now the Defendant, by counsel, Patrick V. Baker and files Defendants Reply to States Response to
Defendants Motion to Correct Error.  

                                                          Procedural Background

That Defendant filed a Motion to Correct Error on December 29, 2006. The State filed State of Indiana's
Response To Defendants Motion to Correct Error on January 12, 2007. Defense Counsel was served with
such by U.S. mail on January 16, 2007.
                                                                  
 ARGUMENT

             Investigative Roles of Detective Garry Long

 The State contends that Garry Long was qualified because of his experience and because he had not been
involved in the criminal investigation into the death of Jill Behrman. An article in the Hoosier Times by Kurt Van
der Dussen on March 16, 2003 indicates that Detective Long was a part of the Morgan County Death
Investigation Team  the veryTeam that was assigned to investigate this case (See Exhibit A an internet
generated copy). Detective Longs role on the Team was not Discovered to defense counsel by the State prior
to trial. Detective Long next acted as a court appointed Security Officer throughout the Jury Trial. Finally,
Detective Long was appointed by the Court to investigate alleged wrongdoing that occurred under his watch.
Detective Garry Long has served in three different capacities in this case, all which created an obvious conflict
of interest that would have been avoided by a Change of Venue.  

 Consumption of Alcohol

 The consumption of alcohol was not known to defense counsel prior to the testimony of Juror #94. The
questioning by the court to the Jurors during the initial questioning was about intoxication. This is supported by
the Courts statement on page 4 of the transcript in which the court states to Counsel for the first time, allowed
drinks at evening meals. It was not until some Jurors were questioned a second time did the court ask
questions regarding the two drink limit.

 Defense Counsel believes that Court Reporter Pamela Bastin use of shorthand during the questioning of
Jurors, Bailiffs, and Security Guards ensured the substantive testimony of the questioning. However, the use of
audio recording should have been used to ensure the exact language spoken during the proceedings. As
noted on page 6 of the transcript, counsel believed it most appropriate and constitutionally fair to Mr. Myers to
be able to make an oral record. The court would not allow such.

 The State focuses on the two drink limit that was set in State of Indiana vs. Judy Kirby and State of Indiana vs.
Tommy Pruitt, both ironically originally Morgan County cases resulting in convictions. The State however does
not address the Courts written prohibition regarding alcohol. As the State is probably well aware, a thorough
search of cases, both State and Federal, fails to retrieve any cases involving Jurors having food fights with
Courts Bailiffs, married men running through hotel hallways with painted toenails and wearing high heeled
shoes, or the fore person of the Jury being nicknamed by other Jurors after a wine,Chardonnay.

 Mike Bays and Failure to Provide Discovery

 In the State Response, the State notes that it is interesting that Mr. Bays worked at Crane Naval Weapons
Center, which is where Luke Myers, the Defendant's brother is currently employed. Mr. Bays never met Luke
Myers until late December, 2006. (See Exhibit B.) Any and all information regarding possible physical evidence
of any sort or significance - including a bicycle helmet turned over to law enforcement by Mr. Bays - should
have been Discovered to defense counsel prior to trial.

 CONCLUSION

 For all the reasons stated in the Defendants Motion to Correct Error and above, the Court should set aside
the Jury finding of guilty and the judgment thereon, order a new trial for the Defendant, and grant a Change of
Venue from Morgan County.

                               Respectfully submitted,

                               ______________________________

                               Patrick V. Baker, #22266-49

                               Attorney for John R. Myers, II

BAKER PITTMAN & PAGE

Patrick V. Baker and

Hugh G. Baker, Jr.

333 East Ohio Street, Ste. 200

Indianapolis, IN 46204

317-686-1900 ph.

317-686-5769 fax

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing has been served upon the following by United States
First-Class Mail, facsimile or by hand-delivery, this 29th day of January, 2007:

 Steven Sonnega

 Morgan County Prosecutor

 Courthouse

 10 E. Washington Street

 Martinsville, IN 46151

                               ____________________________________

                               Patrick V. Baker, #22266-49

BAKER PITTMAN & PAGE

Patrick V. Baker and

Hugh G. Baker, Jr,

333 East Ohio Street, Ste. 200

Indianapolis, IN 46204