.  DISCLAIMER- These comments are not investigated, they are straight from postings/email of readers.  
We do not claim any of this to be proven or factual. We will not be held responsible for the comments of
others.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Comments:

why did so many clues match up to Wendy's testimony of abduction?why would Wendy have passed a
lie detector test that she was telling the truth?

new trial sounds like your best bet ... tell the jury foreman no beer and no heels he just doesn't look
good in them ,,what man could........good luck and may the truth set you free

there is not enough info available to make a sure decision upon Myers guilt or innocence. But I feel
there is enough of a nagging feeling that something is not quite right and the case should be looked
over again.

While I only have knowledge of this case from the media, it does seem these jurors had little evidence to
actually convict this man. We may all think he's guilty but an assumption does not mean "beyond a
reasonable doubt", which is the standard for criminal verdicts.

By the way, the jury is not allowed to discuss any final deliberations until the 12 final members are
chosen. The 12 were not picked until Monday afternoon. From listening to the audio clip on your site, it
sounds they discussed it throughout the trial. You should be able to appeal on that (the audio clip) alone.

Does this juror not incriminate himself here? He states things they did that were not allowed. Thank
goodness they all got to watch both of the Colts games. I mean heck, that would be my top priority
during a murder trial that I am a key player in. Did the guy wearing high heels with the painted toenails
watch the game, or did he cheer?

I don't understand how there is a taped recording of a juror stating that they all were wondering about
convicting with no physical evidence and how they had all decided "going into monday" that there minds
were made up. I don't understand how these things happened, yet they did not discuss the case. When
did they decide on the foreperson? It certainly was not during the time they made the verdict. It takes a
good 45 minutes min to pick one..unless of course they talked about this prior.

if the defendant believes there was jury/juror misconduct, that issue can be brought up on his automatic
appeal. If it is determined that there was jury misconduct, proper relief, like a new trial, would be in order.

Judge Burnham has sealed the pathologist's records. Why? Prosecutor Sonnega hand-picked the
defense attorney. Why? Was all this injustice inflicted on John Myers merely to protect the federal drug
snitch who was implicated in the case early on?

Jill's helmet? We will never have the chance to know. Interesting that the helmet is not being held at any
more regard than that. Why destroy the helmet? Why not give it away or donate it. Does anyone else
think it is odd for the department to DESTROY it. Appears it needed to be destroyed. I just cannot help
but wonder why that is.

The Star says,"...They also cited at least one juror receiving outside information about the case...." He
willing admitted to receiving the outside information. What kind of "guarded" jury was this? That juror or
his girlfriend need to come foward and tell what happened. He is the only juror that has been honest yet.

The victim simply would not have ridden diagonally across the county through traffic as the prosecutor
claimed at trial. She had about 1 hour fifteen minutes for the ride - just right for a trip to Lake Monroe
and back, leaving time to prepare for work and to arrive there by noon. The entire case hinges on this
single point as Sonnega well knew.  If the victim actually left the house that day she would have ridden
south.

Ask the Behrman's where they searched, South. What did her Dad say when they found the bike?, she
never rides in that area.




**They don’t know  that she was abducted from Maple Grove Road. They did not enter anything that
would establish her being seen in that area riding her bike. She was last positively seen on Harrell Road,
which is going in the opposite direction. They did not entered anything that could place John Myers was
at the Harrell Road area or anywhere near there, nor have they even hinted that he may have been.  In
reality they (the prosecution) excluded that by saying his phone records show him at home.

**My already shaken faith in our justice system is further shaken.  How could 12 sensible people send a
man to what amounts to life in jail on "she said he said"?  Isn't that considered hearsay and therefore not
allowed in court?  Lord pity me if there is ever a crime committed in my neighborhood and the jury
doesn't like my looks or the way I act.  I don't have money to send you--I certainly wish I did--but I send
prayers for justice for John.

**I agree. They want closure and are willing to ruin someone's life with circumstancial evidence to do it. It
shows how much evil is out there when society is willing to let an innocent person take the heat just so
some sort of closure can be received

**I cant even think about the stuff you and your family have been through I have known John and all i
can say is I pray that the people out there judging him  just think this could be one of my family members
...would I want this to happen to them?

**Wendy Owings made a confession that she, Uriah Clouse and Alisha Sowders (now Evans) had hit Jill,
wrapped her in plastic, stabbed her and threw her into Salt Creek. Investigators found a plastic tarp with
slash marks as well as a knife. Do you believe that it is  just a weird coincidence that these items were in
the salt creek just as Owings said? Maybe, someone fearing that Owings would confess under pressure
moved the body. That's not inconceivable.  After Owings confession in March of 2002, she went to the
Salt Creek with investigators. It would be a logical assumption that she accompanied them there to point
out the crime scene. That is when the knife, along with other physical evidence was found.

**I'm having a hard time with the chance encounter that Myers allegedly had with Behrman while she was
riding her bike. It seems the prosecution is sidestepping the issue of what happened to her bike. I also
remember reading that the bike had white paint on it. Myers was wanted because he had been driving a
red car at the time. These things do not add up.

**This is justice? Why did they even indict this man in the first place? For odd comments made, that we
all make everyday.. never thinking that someone is going to assume we killed someone because we said
that. Gosh, I will be much more careful myself, I just made a comment yesterday about killing someone
(jokingly, but I said it). Not that I ever would EVER do that, but if I can be convicted on that, that is scary.
My heart goes out to both families represented. I pray that God's will is done... I pray for comfort for the
Behrman's and for this to not end, but the real killer found and justice done for Jill and for John.

**I can not believe that any person could be convicted of this serious of a crime on such little evidence. I
am happy that the Behrman family finally feel they have justice and some peace of mind. But I am still
not convinced that have the right person.

**I feel he was given an unfair trial. I don't know who did it, and apparently the police didn't either. Even
the FBI guy said he feels John wasn't the one. Now the guys that made the stupid comments, well what if
you were in the wrong place at the wrong time. And you judge him on his past. You never did ANYTHING
wrong in your life? And if you say no, then smack yourself, why? Because you just did by posting a
comment saying he did it.. THERE WAS NO PROOF! All the jurors that made a comment said it was
because they were emotional about the testimony. Did any one say "well the evidence was there, and
thats how we got the verdict!"? It's almost comical that a man can get convicted and sentenced to
65years or even death. With Out any tangible evidence!

** I too believe your son had a rotten trial and am not totally convinced he was guilty. But I do believe he
is no angel, but then again, who is these days? I do have some questions for you and some info that  
might interest you.

**I believe the pressure for the City Officials and police department to solve this case--put too much guilt
on John.
This whole case was unbelievable from the Start the police department and the media--looked to me like
they were just grasping at anything they could get to close this case.
But in my opinion--the  Media made it look like John's whole family was saying that John's actions at the
time of Jill's murder--was very suspicious.  And also did the media say that John--stated to his
grandmother that he did something to Jill?  In my opinion John does not fit the criteria to do something
like this--he is a local guy-- and his background does not fit the crime. They should be looking  for a
sexual pedophile.
If John had the funds to hire a good attorney--I believe he would have been found not guilty.
I will pray for your family,  I am sorry you have to be rich to achieve the justice that you deserve.

**During the complete trial my husband and I said he was not guilty, I just felt like he would be convicted
just so they could say it's over, and the justice system could say they,  found the killer. I feel so sorry for
the Behrmans I would never want to have to face what they have been going through, but I think the real
killer is still out there.  I pray also that someone would shed light on this case so the right person would
be convicted for this terrible crime on this young lady who died so young.

**I sent you an article about Jim Izard Women's Basketball Coach that was fired at IU March 6, 2000 two
months before Jill disappeared. I feel that he should be checked out as a possible suspect as he hung
out at the IU Sports center where Jill worked and Jim had alot of problems according the the Herald
Times articles written about him..according to the articles he favored younger girls at IU. He killed himself
just this year from a gun shot wound to the head..

**I want to take a second to say, I am sorry this verdict came out like it did. I feel John was wrongfully
tried. On the evidence alone, there wasn't enough reasonable doubt I feel to convict him...
I do not know John, but followed the case, and I myself being in trouble in the past, and threatened by
the law, can understand his plight.
Now I don't know if he did this or not, there "IMO" was not enough evidence to prove otherwise. It should
have been a miss-trial But heh this is Indiana, more ppl like GW in this state than everyone knows..
Ill pray that the truth comes out, and in the end God will be the judge on this.

**I have no evidence to offer, but I thought you might be interested in an article that appeared in the New
York Times today.  I do not know whether your son is innocent or guilty, but this article certainly shows a
case where an innocent man was sent to prison while the guilty man remained in the community.
I do pray that God will help you discover the truth.
December 21, 2006  New York Times  http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/21/nyregion/21brown.html?
_r=1&oref=slogin&pagewanted=all

**Ms Shoemake testified at trial that she received an email from Jill in May 2000 (after the end of the
spring semester at IU) that Jill was seeing an older man.  The email apparently did not identify the man
by name.  

**I just wanted to let you know I'm praying for you and I pray for justice for John & Jill.

**Of course, if John is innocent we want this travesty reversed. Therefore, why not post on the site the
reasons why John is innocent. I don't see anything here that proves his Innocence. For instance,
character witnesses saying what a great man John is and how he is incapable of doing such a thing.A
complete police record listing any arrests, convictions etc. Showing the public that he is clean, and free
of any misdoings in the past.  Let's find that shotgun and prove that it isn't the murder weapon. Post a
reward for information leading to the arrest of the real killer.
This is what I am talking about. Can you do this?

**My mother and I do not believe that you could have done this.

**I also couldn’t believe the verdict and something in my heart tells me that John is innocent.  I know most
people at the Monroe County Sheriff’s Department feel the same way.  I wish I had information, but I
haven’t heard anything other than something about a Fireman’s House that is located where Jill’s bike
was found and a dog following Jill’s scent to that house.  I don’t know how accurate it is, but maybe it is
some information that you don’t have.  Our prayers are with you.

**I just feel so horrible for all that your family has been through.  I know that you are good people, and I
cannot fathom how a jury can convict on such little hard evidence.  You have been in my thoughts and
prayers.  I hope that you are successful in your appeal.

**It is amazing to me that someone (even John's mother) can be critical of the jurors behavior yet defend
John who at the very least is known to be abusive and immoral.

**Everything I read during the trial just screamed circumstantial straw grasping. I was quite surprised
when he was found guilty and given such a stiff sentence based on the shaky evidence that was
presented. It seemed to me that investigators wanted to hastily charge someone to close the case
quickly no matter how minuscule the evidence was.
I really think he has gotten the shaft from the beginning and hope the truth comes out so all of you string
him up and hang him rednecks will have to eat your words.

**NO EVIDENCE is a big problem NO MOTIVE is a bigger problem NO CONNECTION is another problem.
Does not meet the standard of proof i would like to see.

**Even though they kept badgering him for hours, he maintained his innocence. Even when they lied to
him about his dad, he maintained his innocence. Even when they lied about having DNA on him, he
maintained his innocence. He has never claimed anything, but his innocence. His lawyer advised him to
not take the stand, the testimony of his interview was the same thing. He has nothing to hide.

**Man I have to say this sounds like the textbook scapegoat job to me. The jury sounds like a bunch of
jackasses even by Indiana standards. How can you find no reasonable doubt when there is nothing but
hearsay for evidence? The prosecutor sure knows his average Indiana resident pretty well.

**Our prayers are with you. We know he is innocent. I pray for the people that have wrongly convicted
this man as well, may they weigh their conscience and come forward with truth.

**I think he is innocent also

**Aren't you curious why no technical evidence was entered at trial about the white paint marks found on
Jill's bike? Could it be that the paint was analyzed by the State Police Crime Lab and found not to match
the white paint on the Bloomington Hospital 1995 Ford van? In fact, there was no forensic evidence
entered at trial from any of John Myers' vehicles, either. There wasn't any to be found.

**I have known John since he was 16. I followed the trial very closely and there were so many
discrepancies. He would not do something like what he is accused of. I didn't come forward earlier
because I didn't really think that he would be found guilty there was no proof of anything. He didn't know
the girl, there was no DNA, no finger prints, no witnesses. Someone really wanted him found guilty, to
pull all the stupid things that were done. How can anyone be condemned just because someone wants
to? You have to have something to press charges, the jury just wanted to go home, probably all had
hangovers. They didn't take time to find "beyond a reasonable doubt" there was nothing to show them
that. I wonder if that bicycle was beaten up as though it had been hit by the truck, who was in the red
car, these things were not considered, as far as I can see. The bicycle was never shown, on the news
only as a far shot so you couldn't see what condition it was in. TOO MANY THINGS, NO PROOF, How
then did this happen more things of significance were found in the creek-than in the field-plastic bag,
bungy cord, knife. To many questions, no answers.......

**I agree with everything that has been said!!! I really think if they looked more into the red car and other
things that came out early in the investigation and stop focusing on John, they would finally have the
truth! I have a question, Why did Wendy Owens come out and say she and others had something to do
with this murder and why have we not heard of her or her few friends again? It is scary to think that the
true murderer is walking the streets of Ellettsville/Bloomington!!!!!
John and his family are in our prayers!
God Bless!

** have followed my instinct from the get go. No one has proven to me that john Myers is guilty. There
are so many confusing things that don't add up but i can't find a one of them that say john Myers is guilty
with out doubt. What kind of justice system do we have. This could have happen to anyone let someone
point the finger at and with no real evidence convict you send you to prison. Then oops
we got the wrong guy sorry about your luck and life you've lost john you sure can't get it back.
Our justice system is very sad. But just remembers this john, Jodie,and family GOD is our real judge and
he knows the truth. And each and everyone of must stand before for our own judgement.
May GOD be with you!!!!!!

**The prosecution admitted there was 'no evidence.', how could it be weighed? The rickitty bridge, Lang
drove Carly over making her realize where she was, had been resurfaced since 2000 when she (was?)
there. The actual bridge she went over was Woodall Bridge a wooden decked bridge (rickitty) 1 mile
north of where John was raised. He knew that area like the back of his hand. Night driving in this
hilly/winding turns area would be easy for him. The Woodall bridge was replaced in 2002. Yes, I pray for
the victim's family, and pray the killer is found. Please, Juror, talk to us.

**This case reminds me of the book out now entitled The Innocent Man, by John Grisham about a couple
of guys who were convicted of a murder they did not commit, spending years in prison and on death row
before the truth was known. It was based on overlooking non physical evidence, non interviewing those
who should have been persons of interest, lack of physical evidence, misguided prosecutory ambitions
and falsehoods. Linking Meyrs to the case, only by proximity and innuendo by third parties where he
supposedly "linked" himself to the case isn't evidence he actually committed any crime, much less
murder. Read Innocent Man and you will see similarities of the prosecution attempting to force feed the
jury suggestions of guilt, based on presenting a case solely on circumstantial non facts.

**We cannot convict people on hearsay, innuendo, mere proximity of the accused to a crime scene, look
over other potential persons of interest. Surely the desire to solve a case doesn't mean a civilized
society wants innocent people jailed, executed and forever punished in this life. I don't. Prosecutors
cannot force feed juries the wrong information for the wrong reasons and get the wrong results!

**You should be asking about the green bicyclist's helmet identical to the one used by Jill that was found
near Jill's home in late November 2000. It was turned into Bloomington Det. Tony Pope and never heard
from again.

**I worked at the jail at the time of the Behrman murder. All the inmates who talked to me mentioned 2
men as being the killers. John was never mentioned.(Neither was Uriah.) I called the number the
investigators gave, but they never contacted me.(So much for following up all leads.) I know a woman
who was questioned by the detectives. She knew some of the charges they had against Uriah were
false. At this meeting, she told them one of the above 2 men called her from southern California. He
said,"If it wasn't for that Behrman bitch, I could come back to Indiana." This man fled from Bloomington
after the police talked with him and gave him a lie detector test. He said the test was no big deal, that
both of them took xanax so they could pass it. The detectives were not interested in hearing this. They
wanted Uriah sent up for this crime.
I feel John's lawyer let him down. A first-year law student could have done better. Why didn't he put Uriah
on the stand and show how they tried to send him to prison for a crime he didn't do? As for grandma,
John never said he killed Jill. She knew John had anger and anxiety problems. I feel John was reaching
out for help and understanding, but I don't feel grandma used common sense here.
I guess the bottom line is that any of us may be charged with a serious crime at any time.
Jill would not want the wrong man in prison. This is not justice. However, until we get juries, detectives,
and judges who thoroughly check out evidence, I fear we will see more and more injustices.  

*I've not seen where the evidence points to John Myers to me it points more toward  the married man
who does have something to hide and a reason for all of this.  

** minutes was apparently enough time for them to sit back, drink a cup of coffee and vote, Do I think the
jury deliberated? Not one bit.  Just electing a foreman can take 30 minutes.

**I do not believe John Myers is guilty. May The Truth Prevail.

**They rail roaded John Myers,I don’t think he was guilty.

**It seems too much of a coincidence that Behrman had so many connections to others, and her bike
was found closer to his house than it was to Meyer’s. The thing about the Nun noticing someone
throwing the radio away is also a little too much to dismiss

**There certainly seems to be a total lack of evidence and a whole lot of assumption.
Not that I’m a Myer fan, but after reading his interview and just to watch in the manner in which he carries
himself…enough to leave tremendous doubt.

** I’ve got a lot of doubt about his guilt and personally think the real killer is someone she knew. To
abduct on a whim in broad daylight a total stranger from a fairly heavily traveled county road, and get
away with it for 6 years takes a real stretch of imagination on my part.

**I think that someone really needs to look at the alleged “boyfriend” that worked with her at IU. Someone
actually seen them fighting days before she was murdered. That makes more since to me than John
Myers just driving down the road and seeing Jill and deciding to murder her.

**I can’t believe this case even made it to trial. The prosecution had nothing.

**There isn’t any evidence that Mr. Myers committed murder. This case
was so weak, no charges should have ever been filed. I feel bad for her parents,
but  this man being found guilty is a crime.The bad thing is, we are suppose to be able to have faith and
trust in our judicial system, police dept. etc but this is an example of how they take matters into their own
hands, with no evidence.

**Some of the most shocking evidence in this trial has not been on John Myers, but on the victim and her
family. Which has only convinced me more that there is more to this picture than what has been
presented.  I don’t feel the prosecution  met it’s burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

**I just don’t see what the evidence  they had on him other than his family was suspicious, and he had
owned a shotgun. He seems to pretty consistently deny he was involved.  It doesn’t  help at all  when you
know the police lied about the letter trying to get a confession.


** the interview with Myers and the police lying to try to get a confession, esp. after evidence they did the
same thing to Wendy O, just creates more doubt about the whole situation.  The whole time he just kept
saying he didn’t do it and he seemed like he knew the police were lying about the letter from his dad.

**There was far more evidence presented as to the theory that she may have been pregnant or thought
she was pregnant than was presented against Myers that he had anything to do with this crime. There
was even a statement from Jill’s own mother placed into evidence by the prosecution that Jill had
“thought she might be pregnant and that she may have been having a relationship with a married man”.

**to many unanswered questions and has raised more than it has answered.

**APPEAL !! Under no circumstances could a conviction of Myers stand up to an appeal. You simply can’
t convict a person of murder with the evidence (or lack thereof) that the prosecution brought forth.
That said, if appeals process fails, it is truly a sad day in the history of our justice system. The concept
of being proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt will be thrown out the window. It’s a dangerous
precedent to set.

**  I think we need more evidence to convict John Myers!!  CONVICTED, BUT NOT GUILTY

**I have not see any “Proof” all i see is speculation. And you can’t convict the guy on his past. He may
have had a troubled past, but that is it. Many people have had a troubled past in Bloomington. Just read
the paper, many people are convicted or arrested on a daily basis for violence and threats of violence.
Are they guilty of killing her as well? More evidence points towards the old supervisor. Just because he  
has a troubled past don’t mean a thing!
I say that because EVERYTHING is speculation. There is reasonable doubt. And you can not convict
when there is doubt. “Any” Doubt” means “Not Guilty!” .

**“Owings  took investigators out to the creek, where they found physical evidence and a hunting knife
Owings described as the murder weapon.” www.idsnews.com/news/print.php?id=15234
In this article, police claim that she passed a polygraph test.  
wwwtheindychannelcom/news/2040725/detail.html
I find it hard to believe that she was able to point out the area where she claims the three tossed Jill’s
body, and actual evidence to support her confession could be found at just that area. Furthermore, how
could she pass a polygraph based on a lie?

** Just reading all of these comments really makes me wonder who is responsible.  Good Luck!

**I feel horrible that the Behrman’s have been led through this crazy maze for so many years. Thankfully
we have a God that is just and will bring justice for Jill  and for John. I hope the Behrman’s can find
peace through their faith, and know that God is in charge. I pray too that the community as a whole can
heal and realize how much the one on trial has gone through as well. There was NO case against him.

**I lived close to Maple Grove and Maple Grove Road and traveled these roads frequently. I have had
access to a white van at the time Jill disappeared the same as many of you had. I have owned a 12
gauge shot gun as many of you have or have access to one. I know Morgan County and possibly where
they found Jill as many of you do as well. This is the states case, all circumstantial, and by this anyone
who has had all of these circumstantial things could be guilty. So how safe do you feel with our criminal
justice system, we are suppose to be innocent until proven guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt.  Not
guilty until we can be proven innocent.

** I don't know either family, but wanted to tell you that I feel John is innocent too.  This isn't about the
families.  It is not family against family. It is about a beautiful girl that vanished before her time, and about
a man that has a rocky past, so no one thought it would matter to make him vanish too.  I think that the
two families need to join forces and put all of their efforts into getting this turned into true justice.  I recall
reading that all the Behrman family wanted at this point was the truth.  I don't think we have gotten there,
and after all of the time they have involved,  I would think it wise to make sure that this is your man.  The
evidence does not point to it.  

**I am praying for you.

**I went out and drove the map area you posted, around the waterworks route, then up to Rogers which
turns into Kinser.  I went across 37 to Bottom Rd. I took Maple Grove Road to where it intersects at  
Maple Grove.   I turned left (south) and drove about .5 miles.    I know where John lived.  The trailer sets
back off the road a bit, with other residences between it and the intersection, setting up closer to the
road... totally blocking any view he may have had.  You cannot even see his trailer from the
intersection.  Didn't the prosecution say it was a "crime of opportunity, transferred aggression" ?   How
was he supposed to even know she was out there?  No way could he see her.  Beside the fact  we know
from his phone records he was certainly at home, heck even Dt. Lang states that.  There is not only
reasonably doubt, there is serious practically proven doubt.   This would have been a very long ride to
be taking "quickly" before work.  Does not add up.  Let your conscience be your guide!

**I have been praying about this and am clear that God wants me to help discover the truth.  Is there
anyway  I can help?  Contact me at address enclosed.

**If a detective is friends with a suspects family, would  there be any prejudice in solving the crime?  Just
curious.

** 01/04/07Updated from recent posts

**The American system of justice is one of the many things that make our nation so great. If proper
procedures weren't followed to the letter, especially during Myers' trial, by all means, Myers (and more
importantly, American citizens) deserve another *fair* trial. Waste of money? Not when we're talking
about the integrity of our judicial system.

**Based on what we can read and hear from the media, it appeared to me that the man was found guilty
on 'not' alot of evidence but hearsay and circumstance. When I add the behavior and time taken to
deliberate, the issues with the jury and the court baillif, I believe, unfortunately, this trial needs to be
done again without questions. Better to let 100 guilty people go free than to convict 1 person who is not
guilty.

**There has just been too much craziness in this trial. I think not only should he get a new trial, but it
should be in a different county, with a different judge. Something has not been right about this ordeal.
Justice ? What justice?

**The jury is supposed to act responsibly. The prosecutor is supposed to release all available evidence
to the defence. Each of these scenarios are important for the integrity of our system of justice to be
preserved.

**The Morgan County Court has a duty to retry Mr. Myers if new evidence like the helmet is brought to
light. This helmet could be the link to the real killer. Also, what happened to the earrings found with the
bones? How about the clothing found by the IU grounds keeper by the cycletron? How much evidence
has gone missing in this case?

**I don't know if he's innocent or guilty...but feel that he should have a fair trial and let all the info come
out. It sounds like there were some questionable things that happened during the trial by both the jury
and the court. Does anyone know why this trial wasn't moved elsewhere? It seems like a change of
venue would have been a good idea since this was such a high profile case, especially in Southern
Indiana.

**The alcohol allegations alone are enough to over turn the first trial. Jurors should be sequestered
WITHOUT any form of communication or alcohol available to them. It protects the innocent and assures
the guilty that they wouldn't have "excuses" to have their trials over turned. Jurors are NOT supposed to
be enjoying themselves through partying or have chances of comradery to discuss the case. They are
individuals given the trust to ensure fairness, honesty, scrutiny of facts and make very serious decisions
based on evidence and facts of the case. Everyone of us would expect this from a juror if we were being
charged with a crime.

**It is time for the original investigators in this matter to step forward and tell what they know. But it's
leaking out a little bit at a time, anyway. Perhaps the original investigators could spare everyone directly
involved in this tragedy any further anguish and come clean. This entire proceeding needs an outside
investigation. If it's such an open and shut case, why withhold or deny trial admission to evidence? Isn't
that what a "trial" is supposed to be all about?

**The deputy who was assigned to investigate the allegations reported them to the judge himself:
Baker said he was unhappy the court had assigned Morgan County Detective Sergeant Garry Long to
the investigation because Long was also one of the guards assigned to the jury.
According to Long’s report filed with the court, Baker said, the son of Juror No. 3 dropped off a TV at the
motel where the jury was staying. Baker said that Long’s report also says the court bailiffs allowed cell
phone use by jury members, which was a violation of the court’s instructions.

**John has been convicted on HE said/She said; NO motive, NO DNA, NO evidence.
No physical evidence connects John to the crime; speculation, innuendo and words taken out of context
formed the basis of his conviction. John Myers is innocent. What motive did he have? What evidence?
The grandmother's testimony was taken out of context of the conversation, you can verify this with her.

**He was at home, has proof to show it. He testified via his interview that he is innocent REPEATEDLY,
no motive, no DNA, nothing... There is ZERO evidence. He did not do it  The scent dogs found nothing
North of the bike recovery, HE LIVES NORTH. They searched his vehicles, found nothing. Please just try
to be open minded for a minute... He could not physically have even had the opportunity to leave
between phone calls, run out a mile from his house and abduct her, dispose of all evidence and then be
back in his home to make another call 10 minutes later.




If you would like to help with our defense fund, click below.  Every dollar makes a
difference.  Thanks and God Bless!!
Establish your foundation not on
fluctuating emotions but on the authority
of the written word of God.  It says
Jesus promised never to leave us.

..... lo, I am with you always, even to
the end of the age. Amen.  
   Matthew 28:19-20